
How would Liverpool benefit from buying Malaga?
04/01/2025 02:20 PM
Fenway Sports Group believe there is an opportunity to restore Malaga to the upper echelons of the Spanish and European game and there is huge potential for the only professional team in Spain's sixth-largest city with a population of around 600,000.
The team also has a loyal fan base — even when playing in
the third tier last season, attendances at its rustic La Rosaleda stadium
regularly topped 20,000. That strong support helped the team, coached by
long-time club servant Sergio Pellicer, to get promoted back to Segunda in
2023-24, despite the ongoing off-pitch turmoil.
Malaga is also a well-known tourist destination, and the
Costa del Sol area is home to a wealthy expat community, bringing opportunities
for VIP matchday revenues and international marketing.
Fenway Sports Group is routinely held up as an exceptionally
valuable sporting empire, with Forbes pricing the group at $12.95billion in
2024, pitching them as the world's third-most valuable sporting group at the
time.
A little under half of that amount was attributable to
Liverpool, and during their time at the helm FSG have restored the Anfield
outfit from a dire financial position to one of fairly rude health, especially
by the exacting standards of English football. Across FSG's time on
Merseyside, Liverpool have pretty much broken even, and The
Athletic expects the club to post a profit in 2024-25, alongside
breaking the £700million revenue barrier (the only other English to have done
so to date is Manchester City).
Liverpool benefited from £127.3m in owner funding last
season, though it came via FSG selling a stake in the business to Dynasty
Equity. It is believed, though not certain, the stake sold was only in FSG
Football, rather than the wider group. If so, that valued the football arm —
which at this stage is effectively just Liverpool — at £4.24bn. That's more
than 18 times what FSG bought the club for in October 2010, and not too far shy
of that Forbes valuation.
Sitting on a valuable asset doesn't necessarily mean FSG is
cash-rich, and in truth they've been fairly tight with the purse strings at
Anfield. That £127.3m injection was the first time since 2015-16 that Liverpool
had received funding from their owners and across their time in charge, the
total amount the club has received from on high is £263.6m, a long way behind
several other English clubs. Yet that's more a product of the sustainability
model FSG have employed than any inability to fund Liverpool.
In their first six years at the club, FSG injected £173.3m
in cash, providing the funding needed to get the club moving in the right
direction and, crucially in the long term, to support development at Anfield.
How much would need to
be spent at Malaga?
A look at the wage bills of the Segunda's recently promoted
clubs is instructive of how much might need to be spent at Malaga to propel the
club back into La Liga. In the last three years, seven of nine clubs promoted
to the top tier have done so with staff costs between €14m and €30m, though one
of the outliers was Espanyol, who were promoted last season with a €44.5m wage
bill. Espanyol benefited from a €25.4m La Liga distribution that included
Spain's equivalent of a parachute payment. By comparison, the rest of the
second tier received €5-7m from the league (in 2022-23, Malaga's distribution
was €6m).
FSG would have to contend with clubs with greater turnover
than Malaga but the gulf is not so large as if they were to buy, say, an EFL
Championship club in England. The likelihood of meaningful profit in Spain's
second tier is slim, but the uplift in Malaga's value were they to get back to
La Liga — and stay there — could be significant.
Importantly, any would-be buyer of Malaga will benefit from
already strong support. Those high third-tier attendances were a big part of
the club's finances not nosediving, and the size of the local population makes
for an obvious growth area.
Benefits for Liverpool
Where Liverpool would be more likely to benefit is behind
the scenes. By bringing a club from mainland Europe under their control, FSG
could more easily put boots on the ground from a scouting perspective.
Warm-weather training, that favoured mid-season voyage of many clubs, would
presumably be made a lot cheaper for Liverpool if their owners had ready access
to facilities in the south of Spain.
Be it Malaga or anyone else that FSG choose to take the
plunge with, Liverpool will remain the jewel in the group's footballing crown.
Liverpool fans need not worry about their side falling down the priority list.
More likely any multi-club venture undertaken by FSG would be done so in the
hope of improving Liverpool's lot.
That being said, any purchase would necessarily require
investment in the early stages, much as the buying of Liverpool did. FSG
doubtless have the resources to do whatever they choose in that regard, but any
Liverpool fans hoping they'll change tack and start pouring money into their
club are likely to be disappointed. The buying up of other clubs would make a
move away from Liverpool's sustainable model even less likely than it already
is.
Of course, lots of clubs are doing well without following
the Manchester City multi-club model, but it is becoming increasingly
fashionable.